WHO statement on notification of withdrawal of the United States

The announcement that the United States is withdrawing from the World Health Organization (WHO) has sent shockwaves through the global health community. This decision, made public on January 24, 2026, comes against a backdrop of historical collaboration. As a founding member, the U.S. has played a pivotal role in numerous public health victories, from the eradication of smallpox to significant strides against polio, HIV, and malaria. The WHO has expressed regret over this withdrawal, emphasizing the potential risks it poses not just to the U.S. but to global health security.

The decision to withdraw has been attributed by U.S. officials to what they perceive as WHO's failures during the COVID-19 pandemic, including alleged delays and obstructions in sharing critical information. The WHO, however, has staunchly defended its actions during the pandemic, stating that it acted swiftly and transparently, sharing information as it became available and advising member states based on the best evidence at the time. This divergence in perspectives highlights underlying tensions between the U.S. and WHO regarding pandemic management.

For women, particularly in low-income and vulnerable communities, the U.S. withdrawal could have profound implications. Women often bear the brunt of health crises, from caregiving responsibilities to being disproportionately affected by service disruptions. The collaboration between the U.S. and WHO has been crucial in funding and supporting health initiatives that benefit women worldwide, such as maternal health programs and vaccination campaigns. The withdrawal could lead to funding gaps and hinder progress in these critical areas.

The WHO plans to address this development in upcoming meetings, both at the Executive Board in February and the World Health Assembly in May. As these discussions unfold, there is hope that the international community will seek ways to mitigate the impact of the U.S. departure. The organization's commitment to working with all member states in good faith remains steadfast, and it continues to emphasize respect for national sovereignty in its operations.

Looking ahead, the global health landscape could face new challenges without the full participation of the United States. The U.S. has been a vital partner in numerous health initiatives, and its absence may necessitate increased collaboration and support from other nations to fill the void. Women, particularly those in underserved regions, will be watching closely, as the ripple effects of this decision may directly influence their access to essential health services and programs. As the world navigates this change, the need for unity and cooperation among nations has never been more crucial.